On 15th August, 2012 Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (“SMBC”) purported to sell 3 former public conveniences to “Central Property Line”. On the basis of “information received” I put in a Freedom of Information Request asking for full details of the sale on 12th June, 2014 via WhatDoTheyKnow.com “Sale of Three Public Conveniences”.
English Law does not permit a business to trade simply using
a trading name – such as “Central Property Line”. Putting it simply, a business
must be either (1) a limited company/plc or (2) a limited liability
partnership; or (3) an “ordinary” partnership (eg ab & cd t/a Central
Property Line) or (4) a sole trader (eg ab t/a Central Property Line).
My researches showed that there were 2 limited companies
called “Central Property Line Limited” at different times (both of which have
been struck off the register at Companies House) and the first was operating
from the same Oldbury address as “Central Property Line” but SMBC initially confirmed
in writing that the sale was NOT to either the first or the second versions of the Limited Company.
Thus, SMBC initially stated that the sale was simply to
Central Property Line. This is a nonsense since no such entity can legally
exist. The legal documents conveying the property to the purchaser MUST have given
the full trading title but Mr David Willetts, a Property Manager at SMBC, is
refusing to disclose this (and, as we shall see, other material information).
Whether this is all upon his own initiative or whether he is “only obeying orders”
remains to be seen. The fact is that SMBC’s legal department probably did the
conveyancing of the property and even if they did not, they must have access to
the file which will show in seconds the true legal identity of the purchaser.
I should say that although my Request was made on 12th
June, 2014 there was no reply within the statutory time limit and so on 27th
July, 2014 I was forced to apply to SMBC for a formal internal review. I then
received a letter dated 30th July, 2014 apologising for the delay
which was said to have been due to a “communication
breakdown” and which gave me some interesting information but NOT the key
details I asked for – ie name of purchaser, price for each plot and Land
Registry title number for each plot. Willetts argued that I could obtain the
price and title numbers from HM Land Registry and he has maintained that line when I followed this up. But it is not quite as simple as
that and this is where I need your help.
I do all the work on The Skidder on a voluntary basis and
incur quite a bit of expenditure on company searches, voters roll checks and
Land Registry searches. If I don’t get this right, I waste money. The Land
Registry site is not very user friendly and it is easy to get the wrong
property (as I did at first with regard to Terry Duffy House). Working on the
basis that SMBC will continue to try and impede my enquiries (whilst lying to
me – see below) can you help me identify the three sites with a degree of
certainty so that I can proceed with the Land Registry searches. A copy of a Google Earth shot or simply a good description sent to thesandwellskidder@gmail.com
will be much appreciated. Anonymity guaranteed!
SMBC have told me that the three sites as listed below were
valued by Mr J Page, the District Valuer at a cost to the taxpayer of £1,200 as
follows:
Albert Street, Oldbury - £35K
Jervoise Lane, West Bromwich - £50K
The Shambles, Wednesbury - £45K.
And this is where things start to get really odd. Mr
Willetts has confirmed that the properties were NOT auctioned NOR offered for
sale on the open market. Although not offered on the market SMBC mysteriously received
ONE BID in respect of each property and then sold the bogs to that secret
bidder after “negotiations”. As above, Mr Willetts would not state the correct
legal title of the purchaser nor the price for each plot.
Tonight, things have taken a bizarre turn since someone else
at SMBC has now WRITTEN stating that the negotiations were NOT with Central Property Line
but with Central Property Line Limited -
co no 04373028. She does not say the sale was to that Company but all this
cannot be true since that version of Central Property was STRUCK OFF &
DISSOLVED by Companies House on 15TH DECEMBER, 2009 nearly THREE
YEARS BEFORE the sale! Someone somewhere is not telling the truth!
Clearly if SMBC will not come clean the Land Registry
searches are required. My information so far, is that one of the plots –
Jervoise Lane - was almost immediately auctioned after this transaction. Please
help me correctly identify the three sites.
I will give you details of the two Limited Companies in case
anything “rings a bell” particularly as the first incarnation of the Company also
had its registered office at 36 Birmingham Street, Oldbury although I must make it clear that I am merely repeating what is on the public record and I make absolutely no suggestion of impropriety against any of the individuals named at this point in time.
The first Central Property Line Limited - co. number 04373028 – was incorporated in
2002 and struck off in 2009. The Company Secretary was IMRAN MAJID, then of
Tyseley and the Director/Sole Shareholder was IFTIKHAR ALI, then of Sparkbrook.
The second Central Property Line Limited – co number
07661284 – was incorporated on 7th June, 2011 and struck off on 24th
September, 2013 so that it was in existence when these sales were made. A Mr
TALIB MAHMOOD was initially involved but resigned as a Director on 12th
December, 2011 leaving a sole director and shareholder – ABDUL NAEEM QUYAM then
of Warley Road, Oldbury. (I should say here that this gentleman
is not, as far as I can tell, the same person as Abdul Quyyam of our old friends, Five Star Taxis in Dudley.).
I will, of course, be reporting all this to the Information
Commissioner when I appeal in the next few days. Unless, of course, SMBC want
to give me the true facts in the interim…..
THE SANDWELL SKIDDER - A COMMUNITY BLOG
e thesandwellskidder@gmail.com t @bcrover (Vernon Grant)
Confidential phone no. 07599 983737
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.