Of course. the "leader" of the Sandwell Labour dictatorship, Darren Cooper, has had to admit a huge waiting list in the Borough - just, er, 6,199 in January, 2016. His "guru", the self-declared mentally-ill Andrew Hipkiss, has been regularly tweeting about Sandwell doing so much for refugees whereas Cooper told the press Syrians would NOT be housed in the "socialist paradise". His Deputy, the great orator Steve Eling, has also declared a "crackdown" on council house fraud!
Happily, Sandwell Labour's friends in West Midlands Police have stated that they are not prepared to investigate any of the above! (Incidentally, Cooper and his social media spokesperson have been bragging on Twitter about another "no further action" decision but there has been no announcement from WMP and they have declined to respond to my query about this. What can it all mean and how do Cooper and Hipkiss come to have this information?)
Cooper, being the class dunce, often makes contradictory policy statements when the press office cannot muzzle him and, as we know from the sign in his office, when not seeking spiritual enlightenment from the Yew Tree Maharishi, he relies on guidance from the grave via the late Mr Elvis Presley:
But at least we know that in 2014 he appeared to be rather scathing of the council house right to buy scheme:
Information came my way this weekend about one Kim Oseland. In 2003 it seems that Kim had been living in a "Sadwell" council house since, at least 1997, but then in July, 2003 her and a person believed to be her husband bought the property from, er, SMBC via right to buy. Alas I don't know the price but on 4th January, 2008 the house was sold on for £125,000. One imagines that a healthy profit was turned but, if so, that was no doubt, declared to SMBC since records from 2008 show that, happily, Kim was comfortably ensconced straight back into an SMBC council house in Oldbury!!!! Of course, there can be no question of any shoddy dealings here as Kim is the sister of one Darren Cooper, The Sage of Smethwick himself!!!
An old story:
The old tale of a leading Sandwell figure exposing himself in public and the subsequent - but seemingly belated - cover-up has raised its ugly, er, head again. All info very welcome.
A trailer....
I have recently sent two emails to Cllr John Tipper about a certain matter. In the absence of a response from him to clear the matter up I had this interesting exchange with Jan The Man himself:
Me
Have you had any meetings with Cllr Tipper on an individual basis in the last 12 months and, if so, what was the purpose of the meeting(s)?
Jan
Private meetings between myself and any Councillor, employee or member of the public will remain private.
Me
Ah so it was a private meeting then!
Jan
I'm not going to play word games with you.Looking forward to sharing more on this anon.....
Addendum 22/02/16
I am pleased to say that John Tipper has now contacted me. Mysteriously he had not received my emails even though they had not bounced back. I was able to put an allegation to him from a member of the public and John has categorically knocked it down which is good enough for me. John further adds that he has never had any private meeting with Jan Britton. It's good to talk! Thanks for that John!
THE SANDWELL SKIDDER - COMMUNITY NEWS - READ THE SKIDDER, KIDDER!
PROUD TO BE TROLLED BY DARREN COOPER AND ANDREW HIPKISS.
email: thesandwellskidder@gmail.com facebook Julian Saunders
Confidential phone no: 07599 983737
Why not join "The Sandwell Skidder Readers' Group" on Facebook
Mmmmmm Jan Britton has an obvious deficiency with regard to ‘Social Skills’ and ‘Basic Comprehension!’ Notwithstanding an Annual Salary of £157,192 Per Annum! (Or put another way £3,023 Per Week!) This is all assuming that he was the Author of the Response! – Or was it cast to a ‘Minion?’ – No doubt a Vague and possibly Implausible Excuse, should matters escalate! (Implausible Response Noted)
ReplyDeleteQUESTION
“Have you had any meetings with Cllr Tipper on an individual basis in the last 12 months and, if so, what was the purpose of the meeting(s)?”
ANSWER
“Private meetings between myself and any Councillor, employee or member of the public will remain private.”
Note that Britton does NOT Answer the Question! He gives an almost ‘Irrelevant Response!’ – He Considers it to be merely ‘Satisfactory’ (Possibly regarding the Electorate as ‘Illiterate Proles!’) - But, just read the Question and Answer again! The First Part of the Question requires just a simple ‘Yes or No!’ He might then choose to be ‘Cautious’ with regard to the Second Part! Or he could have responded with ‘I am not at liberty to comment!’ – The ‘Wonder of Email,’ and ‘Selective Reading!’ – Note also, that only the word ‘Councillor’ has been Capitalised!
QUESTION
“Ah so it was a private meeting then!”
ANSWER
“I'm not going to play word games with you.”
If that response were to be given in Court, it should at least incur a Strong Rebuke! – ‘It is a Very Simple Yes or No Answer Mr Britton!’ – Hence, one can determine that ‘There is Something to Hide!’ – Mr Britton being ‘Economical with the Truth!’ – Further Cross-Examination being required! – And, I would be unrelenting!
And of course Don Darren continues to ‘Listen to the Voices!’ – Are those the same ‘Voices’ that Andy Hipkiss hears? – Or has the ‘Midnight Voice Fairy’ preyed upon Britton?